On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Geoffrey wrote: > > Not really a "product" per se, but I'd say you nailed it. > > > > Personally, I would never be caught dead in a Hooters. Your example > > leads me to believe you'd equate the quality of GIMP users with the > > quality of Hooter's clientele. Maybe that wasn't your intention... > > (boy, this thread has gone nutty). > > No, it certainly was not. In my mind the comparison of GIMP to Hooters > is not valid. GIMP is not intended to be derogatory, but we all know > how Hooters gets it's name. > > I'm a GIMP user as well, thus I don't equate myself with the scum you'll > find frequenting Hooters. :)
Do you have a problem with owls? The name is perfectly acceptable! -- Alan _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
