On 8/7/05, Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- michael chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >It won't. But some people would like to keep an entire layer's data, > >but only have some of it visible. I've done things like that before. > >*shrugs* > > Seems reasonable I guess. But wouldn't it be easier to use if all of > the layer were visible and hide some of it by choosing it?
Tell the gimp developers that. I don't know. Honestly. > >Change the image size, I believe. Also, if you're fitting canvas to > >layer, make sure you have the clipped layer selected (you have more > >than one, yes or no?). > > I have only the clipped layer and the "background" layer. Isn't changing > the image size and changing the canvas the same thing? Anyway in all > attempts the clipped layer was selected (since it's the only thing > I've manipulated); the layer had the "walking ants" around it. "Walking ants" means it's not a layer... it's a floating selection... [see my later message]. Solution: Make the "floating" layer non floating - by putting it on another layer. -- ~Mike - Just my two cents - No man is an island, and no man is unable. _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
