On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Christoph Egger wrote:

> > .... the user pays for console switching on slow machines. The user
> doesn't
> > have to switch, it is a feature.
>
> uhmm... I guess you mean: The user doesn't _need_ to switch... :-)

Even worse: how the hell do you know the user doesn't need to switch? I
know _I_ would need to switch many times: we're not just talking about
games and videoplayers, and I find it silly that a feature, which is taken
for granted on other systems, is considered "unpossible or too difficult"
to implement, specially considering that the only case in which this
feature can give some problems on Amigas (and never does, though, due to
attentive programming) can be avoided altogether with kgi.

Fabio Alemagna

Reply via email to