Will:  I agree.  He had to weigh difficult options, including a significant 
portion of the base that was focused on health care more than climate.

In addition to what you said regarding the Senate, Sen. McCain was in the 
process of changing sides on the climate issue as a result of his personal 
reaction to the loss in the Presidential election. Anything less than full 
McCain leadership on the Republican Side would likely had led to slightly fewer 
votes to overcome the filibuster. Also, Sen. Warner, Republican of Virginia, 
retired in 2008.  He had co-sponsored one of the Senate climate bills. His 
retirement removed a strong Republic proponent of Senate passage, which 
lessoned chances of overcoming a filibuster.  So while we can never know if a 
domestic bill would have passed in 2009, it is unlikely.

History may judge Obama negatively, even harshly, for not understanding the 
profound impacts of climate change soon enough and acting accordingly but he 
will fare far better than his processors on both sides of the aisle, especially 
given the large subsidies for wind and solar in the original stimulus bill 
(which accelerated the changing economics of clean power in the US) and other 
programs, including the clean power plan if it survives

=====================================
David Downie
Politics and Environmental Studies
Fairfield University

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Wil 
Burns
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 10:39 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: Schreurs, Miranda; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [gep-ed] good article on Obama and climate change

I’d say Obama was eminently wise at the time. The Senate climate bill was dead 
on arrival given the inevitable use of the filibuster by Republicans, 
especially since there were a couple of blue dog Democrats who were going to 
vote against the bill also for sure. Should Obama had lost this high-profile 
battle early in his presidency, it would have made it much more difficult to 
win other battles, including securing passage of the ACA.

By contrast, the ACA was structured in such a way that it wasn’t subject to the 
filibuster. I suspect Obama decided that it was thus judicious to try to win 
this battle first, and try to build up some political capital. The 
administration was also, simultaneously, drafting the rules for the Clean Power 
Plan, which his administration could implement without Congressional blockage. 
wil

Dr. Wil Burns
Co-Executive Director, Forum for Climate Engineering Assessment
School of International Service, American University
2650 Haste Street, Towle Hall #G07
Berkeley, CA 94720
650.281.9126 (Phone)
http://www.dcgeoconsortium.org<http://www.dcgeoconsortium.org/>

[cid:[email protected]]
Blog: Teaching Climate/Energy Law & Policy, 
http://www.teachingclimatelaw.org<http://www.teachingclimatelaw.org/>
Twitter: https://twitter.com/wil_burns
Skype ID: Wil.Burns
View my research on my SSRN Author page:
http://ssrn.com/author=240348

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Eduardo Viola
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 6:58 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: Schreurs, Miranda 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [gep-ed] good article on Obama and climate change

Excellent article and video! But there is no reflection about what happened 
between June and September 2009. How wise was Obama in giving priority to 
Obamacare over the battle for the climate change bill in the Senate that had 
already passed in the House?
Best,
Eduardo Viola

Eduardo Viola, PhD
Professor Titular - Full Professor
IREL - Institute of International Relations
UnB - University of Brasilia
C.P. 04306
70904-970,  Brasília  D.F.
Brazil
E-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Pesquisador 1B do CNPq
Currículo Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/2685286492991791
Internet: http://www.irel.unb.br
Google Scholar Citations:  
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=NVRS_VcAAAAJ&hl=en

[https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0B07u8J16a6fxNExodlRJQy11aVU&revid=0B07u8J16a6fxUStxMWVvelFwNm9sNHMvK0FVMlkzQ1cyUGs4PQ]www.twitter.com/eduardoviola<http://www.twitter.com/eduardoviola>

2016-09-11 23:22 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Rosenberg 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>:
Yes, thanks Miranda.  And the embedded video is the actual interview with Obama 
by the New York Times reporters.  My environmental IPE class got a lot out of 
watching and discussing it.  I would recommend it even more strongly for a 
comparative environmental politics class as it reveals a good deal about the 
vagaries of environmental policy in a federal state with a presidential system.
Best,
Jonathan

On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Schreurs, Miranda 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Dear all,

this NYTimes special does a great job of summarizing Obama’s climate policy and 
how it came about.


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/08/us/politics/obama-climate-change.html?&moduleDetail=section-news-1&action=click&contentCollection=Science&region=Footer&module=MoreInSection&version=WhatsNext&contentID=WhatsNext&pgtype=article


Best, Miranda Schreurs



Until September 30, 2016:

Prof. Miranda Schreurs
Director, Environmental Policy Research Centre (FFU)
Freie Universität Berlin
Ihnestrasse 22
Berlin, 14195
Germany

Tel +49 30 838 56654<tel:%2B49%2030%20838%2056654>
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Starting October 1, 2016:

Prof. Environment and Climate Policy

Bavarian School of Public Policy/Hochschule für Politik
Technical University of Munich
Richard Wagner Strasse 1
80333 Munich, Germany

Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Tel: 0049 (0) 89 907793220<tel:89%20907793220>

website Deutsch: http://www.hfp.tum.de/startseite/

website English:
http://www.hfp.tum.de/en/home/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"gep-ed" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
Jonathan Rosenberg, PhD
Professor of Political Science
Chair, Department of Social Sciences
Illinois Institute of Technology
Siegel Hall 116E
3301 S. Dearborn St.
Chicago, IL 60616
tel.  312-567-5188
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"gep-ed" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"gep-ed" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"gep-ed" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"gep-ed" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to