Well, its been a day for me so far and nothing anomalous has been
happening. I'm running it in my test environ (the only environ I have at
this point actually) in console on Windows server 2008 R2 with Debug
logging. The logs aren't showing anything extraneous either.
I've only use a small subset of GeoServer's capabilities, but so far "drop
in replacement" is exactly what it seems to be.
The only difference I can see is that this version of jetty isn't logging
the requests. But a few seconds of googling showed this can be easily
enabled (http://wiki.eclipse.org/Jetty/Tutorial/RequestLog) if desired.
Chances are I'll use it for my live deployment and I'll get back to this
thread if anything odd happens.
Jonathan
On 19 March 2013 16:34, Alex Mandel <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 03/18/2013 10:26 AM, Stefano Iacovella wrote:
> > 2013/3/18 Jonathan Moules <[email protected]>:
> >>
> >> I appreciate your point Andrea about limited dev resources. On the other
> >> hand GeoServer is shipping with a four year old web-server (an age on
> the
> >> Internet) that has since received as best I can tell a considerable
> number
> >> of security fixes just in the 6.x branch. Unfortunately most folks
> (myself
> >> included) lack the technical aptitude to offer patches, so we rely on
> the
> >> generosity of the developers in giving their time. For my part I try and
> >> reciprocate with my QA skills by adding to your jira issue count. ;-)
> >>
> >> I'll open an improvement request per your suggestion.
> >
> > Indeed GeoServer does not ship in one flavour, and jetty is just one
> > of the alternatives users can choose.
> > Adding my 2 cents to what Andrea already wrote I think that in the
> > trade off of spare time versus upgrading GeoServer installer including
> > jetty costs are higher than returns.
> > Most of the times you have to deploy web application, i.e. GeoServer,
> > on an application server someone else choose for you. And chances are
> > that you will have to work with JBoss or Tomcat
> >
> > Stefano
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > 41.95581N 12.52854E
> >
>
> If it's on par with a directory swap I suspect there are some users
> willing to test, as someone just did test jetty 8. Now that I know I can
> test on ubuntu jetty versions and see how it works.
>
> Is there a test suite, or test procedure to follow to verify that is
> works, other than loading some layers?
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
> ________________________
_______________________
> Geoserver-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
>
This transmission is intended for the named addressee(s) only and may contain
sensitive or protectively marked material up to RESTRICTED and should be
handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to
receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to
anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the
sender immediately. All email traffic sent to or from us, including without
limitation all GCSX traffic, may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in
accordance with relevant legislation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
