On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Rahkonen Jukka <[email protected]>wrote:
> Applause from my part too. For an average user WFS 1.1.0 gives two
> advantages: srsName and resultType=hits. WFS 2.0.0 gives paging. It hits
> and paging are backported we can be happy with 1.0.0 and avoid a lot of
> other trouble.
>
I don't have a mandate to also backport hits to 1.0, but once you are in
the business of making a custom
WFS client (a standard one won't support paging over 1.1 or 1.0 anyways)
you can always make
a WFS 1.1 request to ask for the total amount of features.
In fact the WFS 1.0 feature collection response does not have room for the
number of hits anyways
(it misses the attribute, it was added as part of the WFS 1.1 spec)
Cheers
Andrea
--
-------------------------------------------------------
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
