Applause from my part too. For an average user WFS 1.1.0 gives two advantages: srsName and resultType=hits. WFS 2.0.0 gives paging. It hits and paging are backported we can be happy with 1.0.0 and avoid a lot of other trouble.
-Jukka Rahkonen- Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > > Yes, I saw that in the GSIP. Much appreciated! > > On 02/12/11 15:44, Andrea Aime wrote: > > Which I have the mandate of backporting to 2.1.x as well as > an extension > > to the WFS 1.0 and 1.1 protocols. Stay tuned :) > > -- > Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]> > Software Engineer > CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering > Australian Resources Research Centre > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------------- > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, > security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this > data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d > _______________________________________________ > Geoserver-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Geoserver-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
