On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 23:47:39 +0100, Zeerak Waseem wrote: > I'm not saying dbus is all that bad, just that it might be a bit > unnecessary for a number of users. Which to me means, that it should > be something that can be chosen, rather than something that's chosen > for you.
It's not there for the users, it's there for the software. How much better would that software be if the developers spent half their time writing code to communicate, write to logs and all the other standard tasks. Next you'll suggest that filesystems should be optional because the apps can always work out which disk blocks to use by themselves. Don't get me started on compilers, what a bloated waste of resources when apps could be written in hand crafted assembly. -- Neil Bothwick
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
