Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > no, but with static exes you have to recompile everything > everytime a security bug is found.
That's the job of the distro buildsystem. Ah, and that dramatically minimizes the chance that things break apart (i still remember the old times when libc updates tended to be dangerous). > Oh - and didn't you just complain about bloat? Nothing means > more bloat than static binaries. As already said, all this under the axiom that libs are *small* and complex/redundant things are done by separate services. Perhaps you might have a look at Plan9 and how its done there. cu -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ cellphone: +49 174 7066481 email: i...@metux.de skype: nekrad666 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme ----------------------------------------------------------------------
