On Freitag 13 November 2009, igwasm wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Volker Armin Hemmann" <volkerar...@googlemail.com> > To: <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> > Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 4:08 PM > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ati drivers. > > On Freitag 13 November 2009, igwasm wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Volker Armin Hemmann" <volkerar...@googlemail.com> > > To: <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> > > Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 2:26 PM > > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ati drivers. > > > > On Freitag 13 November 2009, Igor wrote: > > > В сообщении от Пятница 13 ноября 2009 05:38:24 автор Nikos Chantziaras > > > > > > написал: > > > > On 11/12/2009 11:55 PM, Igor wrote: > > > > > В сообщении от Пятница 13 ноября 2009 00:30:35 автор Volker Armin > > > > > Hemmann > > > > > > > > > > написал: > > > > >> [...] > > > > >> yeah, unpacking in /usr/portage is completly wrong. Just follow > > > > >> the instructions. > > > > > > > > > > I strictly follow the instructions. But "emerge: there are no > > > > > ebuilds > > > > > to satisfy "=x11-base/xorg-server-1.6.3.901-r99"." > > > > > > > > Volker's instructions work, but the overlay method is more > > > > complicated than it needs to be. You can find an easier method of > > > > applying the patch here: > > > > > > > > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-794699.html > > > > > > > > This has the benefit that it works with all versions of X.Org and not > > > > just with 1.6.3 and you don't need a custom ebuild in your local > > > > overlay. > > > > > > > > Note that the patch we're talking about does *not* fix the CPU load > > > > on moving windows; ati-drivers are just too slow with this operation. > > > > It only fixes the resizing, maximizing and opening of new windows. > > > > > > Thank you. But i have question about this patch. Why ati driver is very > > > slow in X.Org? Is it bug ati driver or X.Org? > > > > > > > > >as I wrote before, 'they' changed X a long time ago for intel drivers > > > and screwed over everybody else. So it is X fault - but X devs put the > > > fingers > > >in > > >their ears, say it is everybody's else fault and sing lalala. > > > > I really don`t understand this. X have spec and all must use it. X don`t > > must use spec of intel. If X change spec then all must change drivers. > > Open > > source driver work fine. > > > > > >that has nothign to do with spec and how to use uninitialised memory. > > Hm. Is it undoc hack in X? Could i see this diff in code? I want use it in > other distrs linux. >
look at the patch and google a bit. There has been a lot of talk about this.
