On Freitag 13 November 2009, Igor wrote: > В сообщении от Пятница 13 ноября 2009 05:38:24 автор Nikos Chantziaras > > написал: > > On 11/12/2009 11:55 PM, Igor wrote: > > > В сообщении от Пятница 13 ноября 2009 00:30:35 автор Volker Armin > > > Hemmann > > > > > > написал: > > >> [...] > > >> yeah, unpacking in /usr/portage is completly wrong. Just follow the > > >> instructions. > > > > > > I strictly follow the instructions. But "emerge: there are no ebuilds > > > to satisfy "=x11-base/xorg-server-1.6.3.901-r99"." > > > > Volker's instructions work, but the overlay method is more complicated > > than it needs to be. You can find an easier method of applying the > > patch here: > > > > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-794699.html > > > > This has the benefit that it works with all versions of X.Org and not > > just with 1.6.3 and you don't need a custom ebuild in your local overlay. > > > > Note that the patch we're talking about does *not* fix the CPU load on > > moving windows; ati-drivers are just too slow with this operation. It > > only fixes the resizing, maximizing and opening of new windows. > > Thank you. But i have question about this patch. Why ati driver is very > slow in X.Org? Is it bug ati driver or X.Org? >
as I wrote before, 'they' changed X a long time ago for intel drivers and screwed over everybody else. So it is X fault - but X devs put the fingers in their ears, say it is everybody's else fault and sing lalala.
