Alex Schuster wrote: > I had tried vanilla-sources, with the same results. As expected, there > should not be much of a difference. I am not using tuxonice suspend > features, but I intend to do so in the future.
Hm, ok. > I added your stuff, that did not make much of a difference. I had an empty > modules sections, but all of these modules are loaded by default. Except for > type1, which does not exist. Yea, type 1 is a left over from old days... :-) So what modules does get loaded? > I know this command from when I had a NVidia card, and I am missing the > 'YES' in my output of fglrxinfo. But I do not have a 'NO' there either. fglrxinfo is different from glxinfo. glxinfo is available in the mesa-progs package (emerging this will pull in mesa as well but there's no harm in that, unless you are tight on hard drive space - just make sure you shift back to ati opengl after emerging). > Although the symbol being missed is a different one. Sorry, I didn't read properly... > I thought I read here that they do, but may give lots of warnings in syslog. Well, I'm holding out for the open source drivers... There's nothing in newer fglrx drivers that I need currently. I wish I could be of more help though...
