You know, I was thinking a bit, What with usergroups being the default behavior, do you think it's quite reasonable to use 002 as a default umask? Most group-sharing use-cases I've encountered have people that are sharing groups share files as read-write anyways, and by default, users have their own private group which nobody else is a member of; i.e. g+rw still won't allow others to write them.
- [gentoo-user] umask 002 in /etc/profile Mark David Dumlao
- Re: [gentoo-user] umask 002 in /etc/profile Steven Lembark
- Re: [gentoo-user] umask 002 in /etc/profile Mark David Dumlao
- Re: [gentoo-user] umask 002 in /etc/profile Alan McKinnon
- Re: [gentoo-user] umask 002 in /etc/pro... Mark David Dumlao
- Re: [gentoo-user] umask 002 in /etc/profile Mark David Dumlao
- Re: [gentoo-user] umask 002 in /etc/profile Neil Bothwick
- Re: [gentoo-user] umask 002 in /etc/profile Joerg Schilling
- Re: [gentoo-user] umask 002 in /etc/profile Alan McKinnon
- Re: [gentoo-user] umask 002 in /etc/profile Alan McKinnon