Willie Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> a response like the one you just gave. It was very clear from his
> original post that he answered the OP's question with (I paraphrase
> here)
>
>   "Joerg is a coding God. But the maintainer in gentoo for the
>   cdrtools package thinks that there is a license problem, following
>   Debian's lead, so virtual/cdrtools defaults to cdrkit."
>
> Alan was not stating a fact about cdrtools. He was stating a fact
> about what a gentoo developer thinks. It is great and all that legal
> science and mathematics are both based on logic, but Alan has
> absolutely no control about what logic the developer uses. Nor do
> you, for this matter. If you have beef with the way cdrtools is
> treated, take it up with the gentoo developer that actually makes the
> decision to default to cdrkit and try to convince *him* that there is
> a problem with his interpretation. 

It may be a general problem with social relations in the english language.... 

If you quote a false claim and do not inform people that the quoted claim
is wrong, then you indirerctly support the false claim.

I recommend to simply not quote people that claim there is a problem as lawyers 
verified that there is no problem. 

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]                (uni)  
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]     (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to