On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:07:10PM +0200, Gordon Schulz wrote: > On 7/3/08, Michael Pobega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 02:24:49PM +1000, Adam Carter wrote: > > > I'm finding it unusable as it crashes often. How are you guys finding it? > > > > > > > > > That is how I found FF2, and why I initially switched to Galeon. But > > when Firefox-3.0-r2 came out I gave FF another try, and I don't regret > > it at all. FF3 is a vast improvement over FF2 for me, it's quicker, more > > robust, takes up less memory, and the UI is a lot nicer. FF2 used to > > memory leak like an old man with diareah, but no problems with FF3. > > > > And I'm talking about the mozilla-firefox package, not -bin. For -bin I > > have 2.0.0.14 installed in case I ever need to use FF2 for something...I > > don't know what I would use it for but it can't hurt to have it. > > Probably a bit OT, but out of boredom I decided to give the newly > released Opera 9.51 a spin - and I am pleasantly surprised. It's even > way faster than FF3 and the font rendering is totally awesome. > As I am developing quite some web-based stuff at work their new > Dragonfly Debugger/Inspector is a good substitute for Firebug and the > myopera.com integration supplies the much needed bookmark > synchronisation between machines that Foxmarks handles on Firefox. >
I'm tempted to install Opera, but my system is completely GTK (if not CLI) and I just don't want to waste space with installing Qt ... Is there any possible way to install Opera without Qt support? -- If programmers deserve to be rewarded for creating innovative programs, by the same token they deserve to be punished if they restrict the use of these programs. - Richard Stallman
pgp77hZNI6xnT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
