On Mittwoch, 7. Mai 2008, David wrote: > On Tuesday 06 May 2008 23:54:08 Andrew MacKenzie wrote: > > +++ David [gentoo-user] [Tue, May 06, 2008 at 11:44:46PM +0200]: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I was thinking on making regular backup of my gentoo partition. I'm > > > not interested in incremental backups, just a mirror image of the root > > > filesystem. I've prepared some scripts using dd for the first copy and > > > rsync to keep it updated. How do you make your backups? > > > Any improvements?. > > > > I've used bacula in the past to do backups. It's very full featured but > > also rather complicated for simple backups. > > > > These days I use an rsync-based backup script I wrote called 'yarbs' (yet > > another rsync backup system). > > > > It uses rsync and hard links to keep X days of backups. Easy to use, > > easy to recover from, easy to setup. I can make it available if anyone's > > interested. > > > > If you're using 'dd' does that mean you're copying the entire filesystem > > and not just the files? I believe that can run you into some issues if > > the FS isn't read-only... > > What kind of issues? The idea is to copy the whole filesystem to another > disk and keep it sync. And in case of "crisis" use dd from the backup to > the original disk.
Andrew has a point. dd is not a good choice. FS don't like it if some parts of them are in a different state than others. Also, with dd, everytime you restore, you also restore fragmentation - oh and a bigger partition? Can be tricky. There is nothing wrong with tar. In fact tar is great for this job. dd not. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list