Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > On Montag, 5. Mai 2008, Wolf Canis wrote: > >> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >> >>> extremly long. So long that you have to start ooo several times a day for >>> a year so that the saved startup time equalizes the time spent compiling >>> it. >>> > > >> "ccache" in make.conf is enabled and MAKEOPTS has a reasonable value, I >> have set it >> to "-j2". I follow the rule MAKEOPTS=<number CPUS>. But in the case of >> openoffice, the >> ebuild overwrite this value with "-j1". For the version 2.3.x I had set >> the variable >> WANT_MP but with version 2.4 it breaks the build. But how you can see >> in the following, >> that's only a minor problem. >> > > or not. So everything bigger than -j1 breaks the built. Which makes dual core > cpus useless to speed up compilation. >
Not really, because if you have set -pipe in CFLAGS than you can easily, with top, check how the cpus are used. But that's it, of course. How I mentioned earlier with version 2.3.x I had set WANT_MP=true and MAKEOPTS=-j2 (and with my first builds -j4 and -j5 but that was pretty much useless, because the processes are hinder them self but they don't break the build) and that works for me. The only problem which occurred was this https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210065 > >> wolf-di6400 0(0) 03:04 PM ~ # qlop -gH openoffice >> openoffice: Fri May 2 16:22:23 2008: 1 hour, 20 minutes, 38 seconds >> openoffice: Sat May 3 04:06:11 2008: 1 hour, 19 minutes, 12 seconds >> openoffice: 2 times >> > > emerge -p openoffice-bin|genlop -p > These are the pretended packages: (this may take a while; wait...) > > [ebuild R ] app-office/openoffice-bin-2.4.0 > > > Estimated update time: 2 minutes. > Yeh, of course is that faster but why we use Gentoo? Because of the fast binary install? ;-) > >>> If you are even able to. Openoffice is a bitch to compile. Even the >>> slightest change might break the compilation. It really, really sucks. >>> IMHO openoffice is a nice example for everything that is wrong. >>> >> I can't this confirm. >> > > go to b.g.o and see the countless reports. Or the forums. Or have a look at > the ebuild for all the crap that is there just to get the POS ooo compiled. I can only repeat that this doesn't apply to me and I'm pretty sure that I'm not the only one who don't use the bin-pkg. Although I conduct all emerges at the console _not_ in X. Perhaps that's it. However, every user should do how he/she likes. W. Canis
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature