-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Andrey Gerasimenko a écrit : > On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:32:45 +0400, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 07:36:49AM +0200, Bo ?rsted Andresen wrote: [snip] >> >> The UNIX standard for ages has been simple text output. Why must >> gentoo add trendy colors which change every time some eye candy fanatic >> gets a bug up his butt to change colors when he gets bored with the old >> fashioned colors? the default ought to be colors OFF and you have to >> ask to get them. >> > > If I remember correctly, ls already had colored output when I first saw > linux in 1997. I also do not understand how the console managed to get the > ability to display colors if it was in violation of the standard. Each > portage color has a meaning, and i find it handy to know which lines to > read and which not to. ls, by default, does not display colors (please stop me if I'm wrong) ls command is an alias to ls --color (which is defined in the bash.profile, I think, or any file in /etc/env.d) Maybe anyone need no colored output by default and an alias for those who want colored output? I have the problem with my eix-sync cron job, I don't know how to disable the garbage generated by colored output... [snip] - -- Alexis Lahouze - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gradignan (Bordeaux) - France - Terre clé pgp : 0x7729E023 (subkeys.pgp.net) fingerprint : 43F9 589F CDF7 7A21 A43E 048D A45E E8CA 7729 E023 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGE311pF7oyncp4CMRAsAlAJ4rNXgC6p5IpecRovROCHpgX/PSowCgmSZR KB8zciGrhTh+ceHr4t2gq1g= =E4Sc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
