On Wednesday 30 October 2024 23:24:19 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Thursday 17 October 2024 16:00:36 GMT I wrote:
> 
> --->8
> 
> Well, it looks as though I have it working, over an Ethernet link anyway.
> There's now no /mnt/nfs with fsid=0, with the portage tree and the packages
> directory mounted below it. This is /etc/exports on the i5:
> 
> /var/db/repos/gentoo
> wstn.prhnet(rw,sync,insecure,nohide,no_subtree_check,all_squash,anonuid=250
> ,anongid=250)
> /var/cache/packages
> wstn.prhnet(rw,sync,insecure,nohide,no_subtree_check,all_squash,anonuid=250
> ,anongid=250)
> 
> Those are just two long lines. Breaking them seemed to cause problems. You
> see that there's no intermediate mount point.

Yes, the /etc/exports syntax is sensitive to breaks or spaces.  There should 
be a single space between the exported directory and the client's hostname or 
IP address and no more.


> The last two weeks' work has left me unsure of the integrity of the i5, so
> I'm going to install a fresh new system and save it before tackling the
> wireless link. Then I may be able to coil up that great long Ethernet cable
> and stow it.

Hmm ... if your NFS configuration works over wired ethernet, but not over 
wireless, this could point to a lower network level problem.

I tend to use static IP addresses on both endpoints to simplify checks and 
configuration, but if you use hostnames check reverse name resolution is 
correct and adjust your /etc/hosts on both ends, check the DNS configuration 
on your LAN and check the client/server IP allocations are as they should be.

Temporarily disable firewalls on both ends and check connectivity and access 
to NFS ports 111,2049 on the server.

Check firewall logs/rules on the wireless router and configure accordingly if 
they are blocking. 

Finally, make sure hostnames/IP addresses are correctly reflected on NFS 
configuration at both ends.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to