On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 11:42:32AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Saturday 26 October 2024 09:10:44 BST Eray Aslan wrote: > > fwiw, net-dns/unbound is a good choice for a resolver even if you are > > running in a systemd environment. > > Interesting. I run dnsmasq here; would unbound be better, or less good? I've > had no trouble with dnsmasq - it just does the job.
I should have qualified that statement. Sorry. dnsmasq is optimized and arguably a better choice for client systems, esp with intermittent internet access (phones, laptops etc). And I find unbound to be a better choice for server environments. Since I am familiar with unbound, I tend to use it everywhere but that is just personal choice. -- Eray
