On 01/14 08:54, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2018-01-14 05:49, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > I tried Palemoon some time ago. I checked its security and privacy > > feature with certain sites on the internet, which provide such > > services and found some issues, which I wanted to discuss on their > > forum. The answer was not to believe such sites and in result security > > would be a matter of how much I believe in a certain software. > > I am keen to see a link to that discussion. I searched the forum for > "meino" and "tuxic" but got no hits for either. Can you help me? > > -- > Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, > if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. > To reply privately _only_ on Usenet, fetch the TXT record for the domain. >
Will see, whether it is still there...here it comes: https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=14531&p=103898&hilit=mcc&sid=9477d72d647e5e361a52372fa5388ced#p103898 Cite: | "But as for me, I believe that Pale Moon comes with optimally secure | defaults since I have felt little need to change anything in regards | to security. If however you do not trust me or Moonchild, the | developer of Pale Moon, when we say that Pale Moon is secure enough as | is, then you are free to use whichever browser you trust is more | secure." Keywords (more me at least) here were "believe" and "trust"... Say, I would produce firewall systems professionally and would "believe", that they are secure and "trust" in my work despite the fact others has done some tests which render this security questionable...would I be called a software engineer? But this is only my point of view and my personal opinion, which may or mau not be valid for others. No offense intended! And: I dont want to start a flame war here. Yoy asked and tried to give a answer, which may be useful onlu to explain my own point of view. Cheers Meino
