correct, i plan to soon use someone with encryption and a "normal" non web based reader. i know there are other providers for this. sorry about the top postine, yes it's very clumsy just to try bottom posting. the problem with unencrypted or merely ssl encryption is it's severly broken, when i've made a secure connection, and correct info shows up with the wrong cert it's pretty obvious who's be rude and wasting resources. of course lots of sites have totally broken certs, and you probably know that for ssl there are 3 sets of binary numbers that nearly everyone does. then again in 6 months i'll likely be using my own email accounts on my hardware.
-- The Power Of the People Is Stronger Than The People In Charge. 21. Aug 2017 12:04 by rasmus.thom...@protonmail.com: > The problem with email providers which store all emails encrypted ( as in > end-to-end ) is that they usually require a specific app ( providers could be > protonmail, tutanota etc. ). Both of which don't support bottom posting ( > well ), at least on mobile devices > > Rasmus > > > -------- Original Message -------- > On 21 Aug 2017, 19:56, J. Roeleveld < > jo...@antarean.org> > wrote: >> >> On Monday, August 21, 2017 6:44:07 PM CEST Dale wrote: >> > >> mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com>> wrote: >> > > precisely what happened, sorry i didn't realize that chainging the >> > > "subject" line causes confusion. now i know, now i can avoid that >> > > mistake. >> > >> > > 21. Aug 2017 09:37 by >> rdalek1...@gmail.com>> : >> > No problem. By the way, top posting is sort of frowned on. However, we >> > also realize some devices don't play well with bottom posting. If >> > possible, set it to bottom post. If not possible, oh well. ;-) >> >> I use multiple devices. All of which can be set to bottom-post. >> Might need a better email app, but that should not be an issue. >> >> -- >> Joost >> >>
