Interesting that it includes fsck (any by the looks of https://busybox.net/BusyBox.html, also fsck.minix) but none of the other fsck's. The choice of mkfs is a different set, with mkfs.ext2, mkfs.minix, mkfs.reiser, mkfs.vfat included.
- [gentoo-user] [OT] busybox fsck vs. fsck.ext4 ... experien... tuxic
- [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] busybox fsck vs. fsck.ext4 ...... Jonathan Callen
- Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] busybox fsck vs. fsck.... tuxic
- Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] busybox fsck vs. f... Adam Carter
- Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] busybox fsck v... Nils Freydank
- Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] busybox f... tuxic
- [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] busybox f... Jonathan Callen
- Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] b... Adam Carter