On 03/30 06:49, Jonathan Callen wrote:
> On 03/29/2017 10:42 PM, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Before doing the wrong decision:
> > How "secure" is it to use fsck of busybox in a limited environment
> > (SoC) to check sdcard partitions (etx4) occasionally instead of using
> > fsck.ext4 ?
> > Does someone has some experiences with this ?
> >
> > Thanks a lot in advance for any help!
> > Cheers
> > Meino
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> The fsck applet provided by busybox is just the fsck(8) driver, which calls
> the fsck.${FSTYPE} command to actually check the filesystem. You still need
> fsck.ext4/e2fsck from e2fsprogs to actually do the check.
>
> --
> Jonathan Callen
>
Hi Jonathan,
thanks for your reply! :)
That means, that one or both of the other binaries have to be
somewhere on the sdcard...
I have to search deeper ;)
Cheers
Meino
