On 2016-12-20 17:21, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am 20.12.2016 um 05:23 schrieb Andrej Rode:
Yeah they make life easier. From your talk you never had a problem
with
eth<0,10> switching names after boot. Everyone who had them
appreciates
predictable network interfaces.
Everyone who had them could learn how to write simple udev rules to get
fixed eth<0,10> names after every boot. No systemd and no "predictable"
names necessary.
right
Nevertheless I'm still wondering what's so predictable at those
incomprehensible, cryptic device names anyway. And I don't want to know
that.
Maybe there are different opinions, but what is cryptic on - as a
typical one - enp3s0?:
e - ethernet
n - network
p - pci (port) ...
3 - ... 3
s - slot ...
0 - ... 0
Just an example. The real mess with systemd is that it violates the good
ol' Unix culture. Especially by "capturing" udev. Thanks to Gentoo for
eudev!!!
Heiko Baums
--
Sent with eQmail-1.10-dev
