On Friday 15 Jan 2016 03:02:07 Dale wrote: > Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > On 15/01/16 10:15, Peter Weilbacher wrote: > >> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > >>> I thought these are only security fixes? Version 20 is actully > >>> feature-complete and in-par with the Windows version 20. > >>> > >>> v11.2.202.559 might be from December, but it's based on an ancient > >>> version > >>> from many years ago feature-wise. > >> > >> That may well be the case. But who cares about features in a tool that's > >> basically dead and only installed on 99.9% of the machines because some > >> stupid websites[1] need it? > >> > >> Peter. > >> > >> [1] That work with the feature set of v11.2 -- at least I haven't heard > >> otherwise. > > > > You haven't visited enough porn sites then :-P > > Well, so far that weather radar site is the only one that I have found > that needs flash. If they would switch it to HTML5, flash could be > gone. I wouldn't complain about that. > > Dale > > :-) :-)
In the UK websites like Channel 5 will not play on Linux any more: http://www.channel5.com/demand5 They said that they will not support the platform (too small a percentage of users) although I am not sure how android based smart TVs can stream this channel. -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
