Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 15/01/16 10:15, Peter Weilbacher wrote: >> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >> >>> I thought these are only security fixes? Version 20 is actully >>> feature-complete and in-par with the Windows version 20. >>> >>> v11.2.202.559 might be from December, but it's based on an ancient >>> version >>> from many years ago feature-wise. >> >> That may well be the case. But who cares about features in a tool that's >> basically dead and only installed on 99.9% of the machines because some >> stupid websites[1] need it? >> Peter. >> >> [1] That work with the feature set of v11.2 -- at least I haven't heard >> otherwise. > > You haven't visited enough porn sites then :-P > > >
Well, so far that weather radar site is the only one that I have found that needs flash. If they would switch it to HTML5, flash could be gone. I wouldn't complain about that. Dale :-) :-)
