On Sep 18, 2014 5:19 AM, "James" <wirel...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > Rich Freeman <rich0 <at> gentoo.org> writes: > > > > Uh, the only thing the Linux kernel does is spawn a single process as > > PID 1 and offer a VERY STABLE system call interface for that and > > future processes to make requests. Nobody is going to break sysvinit > > if that happens to be the thing you tell Linux to execute as PID 1. > > OK, where are your performance studies on how wonderful systemd is? > Simple (2) identical system except for systemd only on one. Run a > wide variety of tests, publish the data. > > Publish perfomanced metrics; Choice; Unreasonable? >
The classic open source answer to being told to do a lot of work on publicly available data is "do it yourself, youre not paying my bills you entitled ____". (paraphrased from "code talks") > > > > Whether anybody else actually supports sysvinit is a different matter. > > I'm sure it will be around in Gentoo for a long time, and those with > > official Gentoo support contracts will get the same care they are used > > to. :) > > I'm not sure if this is a threat, a promise or are you just trash talkin > with me now? > > Besides, there is another thing you are not considering. The world of > embedded linux >> user linux. So, the embedded designers are all > wonderfully in line with systemd? Have you been to any of those > forums? They live by cgroups, because a few folks showed them how > to minimize embedded systems with age old state diagrams. Have you > offered them the systemd or highway plan yet? last i checked, systemd uses cgroups - its a central part of the service management bits. so what the frack are you on about? > > It's not me, Rich, it lots of other technically astute folks that > are not happy. I just want choice. I hope systemd is wildly successful, > but I'm old school, so you and others are going to have to "show me". > > > > James > > > >
