Am 21.07.2014 23:40, schrieb James: > Stefan G. Weichinger <lists <at> xunil.at> writes: > > >>>> Anyone playing with wayland already? >>> Not yet..... >>> Closely related, is the QT5 approach to start experimenting. >>> This might help [1] >>> [1] http://qt-project.org/wiki/QtWayland >> hmm, thanks ... I am not sure how to apply this > Most Desktops will be a while before interacting with Wayland, > let alone supporting it natively, imho. Bloatware like gnome > and KDE will be the last to get QT5, Wayland and a myriad > of new, super_fast, secure desktop toys, imho. > >> You suggest that by running QtWayland I might be able to run gnome with >> wayland? > I don't 'gnome' or 'kde' anything anymore. Those bloated, security risks > will be the last ones to support Wayland, imho. > > LXQT(5) is way ahead on Wayland, as they already have testing version > of lxqt running on qt5 (grep this list archives for discussions). > > "LXQt Got Full Support For Qt5. Wayland Support Will Be Soon Added" > > > http://linuxg.net/lxqt-got-full-support-for-qt5-wayland-support-will-be-soon-added/ > > > Best to the site for help, as I'm not on the razor's edge > with LXQT. I'm working on other stuff for a few more weeks...... > Skinny (LXQT5) is the new "PHAT". Join the revolution. LXQT is up to > 13 devs now. Project is 'on fire', so pull up a seat, and get > roasted! > > hth, > James > >
who told you that 'bloated' buzz word? The same people who told you about 'the cloud' or 'web 2.0'?
