On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 4:39 AM,  <cov...@ccs.covici.com> wrote:
> Canek Peláez Valdés <can...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 5:26 PM,  <cov...@ccs.covici.com> wrote:
>> [snip]
>> >
>> > Well, the workaround sort of worked -- it went through the initrd -- I
>> > had debug in the kernel command line, but it did not stop for nothing!
>> > When it went to the real root, however it did not activate any of the
>> > lvm volumes I had except for what I specified in the kernel command
>> > line, causing things not to work well.  Also, I noticed that if insisted
>> > on using the predictable network names, even though I have
>> > /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules and
>> > /etc/udev/rules.d/80-name-slot.rules which work fine in openrc to give
>> > me back my eth* names.  So all in all, it was a mess and took me to an
>> > emergency shell and that was the end of that.  I did eventually activate
>> > some volumes by lvchange -aay, but obviously that would not work well.
>>
>> OK, I was a little mystified about why dracut-036 worked on my system
>> and 037 didn't. Before I tried any workaround, I wanted to know what
>> changed from the previous version to the current one.
>>
>> So I generated an initramfs with dracut-036-r4 and another one with
>> dracut-037-r1, and I tried to see what changed from one to the other.
>> The answer is surprisingly easy: in /etc/cmdline.d/, the following
>> files where in the 036-r4 version, but not in the 037-r4:
>>
>> 90crypt.conf
>> 90lvm.conf
>> 90mdraid.conf
>> base.conf
>>
>> Te contents of those files are (90crypt.conf is empty):
>>
>> 90lvm.conf
>>    rd.lvm.lv=vg/vol1
>>    rd.lvm.lv=vg/vol4
>>    rd.lvm.lv=vg/vol3
>>
>> 90mdraid.conf
>>    rd.md.uuid=f4a59e68:fbe4039f:a39fc86d:e9e91e12
>>
>> base.conf
>>    ro
>>
>> So I just changed my /etc/default/grub file:
>>
>> GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="init=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd quiet nosplash
>> rd.lvm.lv=vg/vol1 rd.lvm.lv=vg/vol4 rd.lvm.lv=vg/vol3
>> rd.md.uuid=f4a59e68:fbe4039f:a39fc86d:e9e91e12"
>>
>> I regenerated my GRUB2 config, and now again my LVM test system works
>> perfectly with the latest dracut version.
>>
>> The thing is, I *ALWAYS* use the -H (host only) option, so it was my
>> understanding that the command line should be automatically generated,
>> and it was on 036, but now it doesn't in 037. I think that's a bug.
>>
>> John, with respect to your case: did you used "dracut --print-cmdline"
>> to get the command line? Also, have you tried to use -H to generate
>> your initramfs?
>
> I did not try the -H, I may test with that later.
>
>
> I did look at the --print-cmdline and copied the volumes they mentioned,
> but I have other lvm volumes in my fstab and none of them were activated,
> only the ones I specified in the command line!  This is where I have run
> into problems.  I have quite a few lvms, I want them all activated!

I just have /, /boot, /usr and /home (encrypted) as lvms, but all are activated.

> Also, since I wrote the last message, I have been looking at the
> journalctl output and discovered a couple of things which I would like
> some help on, but getting the lvms to work is more important.
>
> First, whatever happened to DefaultControllers -- I want to disable
> those cpu hierarchies, but that option seems to have disappeared without
> a trace, although you can google and see it in some documentation.

That went away with the new cgroup handling that is being coordinated
between systemd and the kernel:

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=7ac807320a7416463d7ff3ef6ede574863a601c5

> The keyword also was not accepted in an install section I have, what is
> the matter with that?  I want to use my sysklogd for my syslog, how can
> I use that with systemd?

I think you can do that with systemd.log_target=kmsg in the kernel command line.

> Thanks so much for all your help on these things.

John, could you please include here the output of lsblk, your fstab,
your dracut.conf, and your lilo.conf?

Regards.
-- 
Canek Peláez Valdés
Profesor de asignatura, Facultad de Ciencias
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Reply via email to