-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Tanstaafl: > On 2014-02-21 12:17 PM, hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> Then you ignore self-destructive behaviour which is a common >> thing in this world. It can even be intentional, causing no >> emotional, financial, social or intellectual profit. Maybe you >> have never met such a person or have never been in such an >> environment. > > You are confusing 'intent' with 'result'.
No. You are confusing yourself with the rest of the world. > > Even self-destructive behavior is in the vast majority of cases > engaged in with the *intention* of profit. Best example I can think > of would be a drug addict/alcoholic. When they use/drink, they > 'profit' in that the feel better (albeit temporarily), regardless > of the ultimate result. > I wasn't really talking about drug addicts. If you are interested in real self-destructive behaviour, talk to someone who has worked in an asylum which is only one interesting environment that can make you think very different about "people". There are even people who are not driven by anything, not even self-destruction. Pure apathy. Another interesting thing... talk to a trial lawyer who has been in that business for 10+ years. I really doubt that many of those will support your "profit intention" concept. Most of the time it's about short-cut reactions that are merely following instincts or emotional impulses. Strong emotions can make someone lose control and do all sorts of weird things without any hope or intention of improving/gaining anything for living it out. It's chemistry, it changes your consciousness. "Profit" is a bit more complex and requires a minimum amount of reflection, even if it is subconscious, short sighted and follows false assumptions. So these are just 3 points why your generalization does not work, like most of those "all people..." phrases. Unless you hack on the definition until it suits your interpretation, like redefining "profit intention" to "intention". This reminds me of "the user" in computer science papers. Well, which one. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTB6qKAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzD5MH/3qVBSactWRWng+x1bT29eP/ Vsd3pSdP5GJ5JkH8Vj2LAhRJy9feRselI/TnZuXOOT+gTzAT+ip1fgqmIHTkaLEx Z1a4L5WXEQxTq9aSoaBFzxstont0zb6LWHfW+c8H+V6UTXPUv6ZdGqP+PlLMLpYO az0KiB09PMa/a3LOzPjhACQ6s1aRo5d4mUqOG91rxh3bOljt6WlMJ61ZEATQGwZt iZJff4sO0qG9p6YeoZED0ep6QvH4UGkfl3yboiVf08uf9mbGSTnOffe5GSJqeBKo 9uGK/tJJ4vkYqcEG60pZaqBuIguobzh84rwWg8DGs++Nv9dWbXi7Focpdse/OaU= =8l+x -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
