On 28/07/2013 20:23, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 18:35:07 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >>> I could'nt find an emake executable. Which package contains such a >>> beast ? >> >> >> No package explicity claims it: >> >> $ ls -al /usr/lib64/portage/bin/ebuild-helpers/emake >> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 922 Jul 26 16:16 >> /usr/lib64/portage/bin/ebuild-helpers/emake >> >> $ equery belongs /usr/lib64/portage/bin/ebuild-helpers/emake >> * Searching for /usr/lib64/portage/bin/ebuild-helpers/emake ... >> alanm@khamul ~ >> >> >> genlop -l shows the package emerged at that time is portage. I don't >> quite figure yet how the file got created and not recorded as belonging >> to portage. > > That's the old lib vs lib64 thing > > ]% qfile /usr/lib64/portage/bin/ebuild-helpers/emake > returns nothing except an RC of 1 > > % qfile /usr/lib/portage/bin/ebuild-helpers/emake > sys-apps/portage (/usr/lib/portage/bin/ebuild-helpers/emake) > >
Good catch, I missed that $ ls -ald /usr/lib* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 5 Jan 5 2012 /usr/lib -> lib64 drwxr-xr-x 50 root root 53248 Jul 23 10:00 /usr/lib32 drwxr-xr-x 163 root root 163840 Jul 27 01:50 /usr/lib64 drwxr-xr-x 13 root root 4096 Jul 27 01:50 /usr/libexec -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
