On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Yuri K. Shatroff <yks-...@yandex.ru> wrote:
> In the end, I humbly believe it's up to me to judge what effect there is for
> me on my computers.

Yes, that's exactly the point. Scroll up and reread this thread,
though, and you'll get the impression that some complainers seem to
think that Lennart is breaking into their systems and magickally
installing his 175-year old software in them. What's this about 100%
of the users being "forced" to have pulseaudio in?

And don't pretend you don't know what I'm talking about here. If
somewhere up there we're talking about "enforced" choices we're not
talking about gentoo, we're talking about stuff like Fedora or Ubuntu
and even "enforced" is a stretch as you could always go with a
minimal, alternate, or a forked desktop. And it's pretty obvious why
they thought it was sane for pulse to be a default choice.

Basically there's a bunch of vague criticisms of unnamed systems where
"they" force stuff on "all users" for "no good reason". Nevermind that
we can actually state what the reasons are. Fingers in the ears.
neener neener.

Well I have a better theory, "they" made choices for "defaults-using
users" that "you can totally undo" for "pretty decent reasons" but
"some of us" just want to "feel better" about the "choices" we made by
"pointing and laughing" at the ones we didn't. Even when we know so
"much" about the topic that someone actually has to tell us what a
"sound server" is or what its "use cases" are and our "use patterns"
involve typing things in a black box so that pretty text scrolls
quickly and makes us "feel smart" whereas the use patterns of the
average user, uh... "don't".

It's a sane idea for a desktop distro to include pulse as a -default-.
No, seriously, it is. Just, frigging bluetooth headsets. And
per-application volume control. Are there other ways to go about it?
Yeah. It remains to be seen how any of them are an order of magnitude
better than pulse. You don't -like- it? Fine. There's no point in
going on on some tirade about how the poor, oppressed 99% of users
could have been doing just fine with ALSA just like you have with your
more beautiful, hand-crafted system...
--
This email is:    [ ] actionable   [ ] fyi        [x] social
Response needed:  [ ] yes          [x] up to you  [ ] no
Time-sensitive:   [ ] immediate    [ ] soon       [x] none

Reply via email to