> > >> > So if I have 2 physical CPU's with 4 cores each and I enable SMP,
I'm
> > >> > using
> > >> > 8 cores?  Can NUMA be either enabled or disabled when using more
than
> > >> > one
> > >> > physical CPU, or is it required?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> NUMA is a hardware architecture. It's how you access memory on a
> > >> hardware level: NUMA = Non Uniform Memory Access vs a UMA
architecture
> > >> of typical (old/legacy) SMP systems (UMA = Uniform Memory Access).
> > >>
> > >> In a UMA system, all the memory belongs to all the sockets. In a NUMA
> > >> system, each socket has it's "own" local memory. In modern (x86-64)
> > >> processors, each socket has it's own memory controller so each socket
> > >> controls its own local memory. If one socket runs out of memory it
can
> > >> ask another socket to lend him some memory. In a UMA system, no
socket
> > >> has to ask since memory is global and belongs to all sockets so if
one
> > >> socket uses up all the memory ... the rest "starve". In NUMA, there's
> > >> more control over who uses what (be it cores or RAM).
> > >>
> > >> If you have a modern dual or quad (or higher #) socket system ...
> > >> you've got NUMA architecture and you can't get rid of it, it's
> > >> hardware, not software.
> > >
> > > So I must enable CONFIG_NUMA for more than one physical CPU, and
disable it
> > > for only one physical CPU?
> >
> >
> > Yup. But ... Why would you want to disable a socket (CPU)? If you
> > disable a socket (CPU) ... you lose the memory attached to that socket
> > (CPU) not to mention you lose those cores ;)
>
> Sure but it sounds like if my system only has one CPU socket, CONFIG_NUMA
should be disabled.

I read this in make menuconfig:

"The kernel will try to allocate memory used by a CPU on the local memory
controller of the CPU and add some more NUMA awareness to the kernel. For
64-bit this is recommended if the system is Intel Core i7 (or later), AMD
Opteron, or EM64T NUMA."

To be sure I have this right, I should disable CONFIG_NUMA on any system
with a single physical CPU, even if it's an AMD Opteron?

- Grant

Reply via email to