Mick wrote: > On Tuesday 03 Jan 2012 14:55:38 Michael Mol wrote: >> Michael Mol wrote: >>> Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote: >>>> On 02.01.2012 18:58, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >>>>> On 01/02/12 12:47, Mark Knecht wrote: >>>>>> Again, 'equery depends' will tell you if any package locatable >>>>>> through the @world hierarchy needs the package. No need to >>>>>> uninstall anything to do that level of investigation. >>>>>> revdep-rebuild -I is also useful, although more historically than >>>>>> now. >>>>> >>>>> This was essentially Michal Mol's suggestion, and I gave an >>>>> example where it would remove something important. >>>>> >>>>>> Really, the proposal to 'fix --update' doesn't address really >>>>>> knowing what your system is running and why. Get to the root of >>>>>> that and the --update thing becomes the non-issue that many of us >>>>>> think it is. >>>>> >>>>> This would be a suggestion to travel back in time and document >>>>> something that I have no way of knowing now. >>>> >>>> You could create your own overlay with "meta"-ebuilds, e. g. >>>> system-maintenance, customer1, customer2. >>>> Inside the ebuilds you define depends on the packages the customer >>>> wants. Doing so you could wipe everything except the "meta"-ebuilds >>>> from world. When a customer quits you can unmerge his or her >>>> "meta"-ebuild and depclean. >>>> If you add everything needed to the respective "meta"-ebuild, you'll >>>> always be on the safe side. >>> >>> Getting EnigMail set up on a Seamonkey/Win7 box, and Enigmail is >>> complaining that your signature is unverified. I don't know/understand >>> PGP/GPG all that well, but I think this is something you're supposed to >>> be able to fix on your end. If that's not the case, let me know, and >>> I'll get it fixed on my end. :) >>> >>> gpg command line and output: >>> C:\Program Files (x86)\GNU\GnuPG\gpg.exe >>> gpg: Signature made 01/03/12 09:05:56 using RSA key ID 8D16461C >>> gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found >> >> Doh...that was supposed to go directly to Hinnerk. "Reply to sender >> only" my hind leg... > > Looks like a recently created gpg key. Assuming the owner has uploaded it to > a public key server, it seems likely that it has not propagated across the > public servers yet and your enigmail plugin alerts you about it.
Mick, yours gives me the same error: gpg command line and output: C:\Program Files (x86)\GNU\GnuPG\gpg.exe gpg: Signature made 01/03/12 11:01:03 using DSA key ID 792968B6 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found Though trying querying for 8D16461C or 792968B6 at pool.sks-keyservers.net or subkeys.pgp.net gives me "no key found" errors.
