Michael Mol wrote: > Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote: >> On 02.01.2012 18:58, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >>> On 01/02/12 12:47, Mark Knecht wrote: >>>> >>>> Again, 'equery depends' will tell you if any package locatable >>>> through the @world hierarchy needs the package. No need to >>>> uninstall anything to do that level of investigation. >>>> revdep-rebuild -I is also useful, although more historically than >>>> now. >>>> >> >>> This was essentially Michal Mol's suggestion, and I gave an >>> example where it would remove something important. >> >> >>>> Really, the proposal to 'fix --update' doesn't address really >>>> knowing what your system is running and why. Get to the root of >>>> that and the --update thing becomes the non-issue that many of us >>>> think it is. >>>> >> >>> This would be a suggestion to travel back in time and document >>> something that I have no way of knowing now. >> >> You could create your own overlay with "meta"-ebuilds, e. g. >> system-maintenance, customer1, customer2. >> Inside the ebuilds you define depends on the packages the customer wants. >> Doing so you could wipe everything except the "meta"-ebuilds from world. >> When a customer quits you can unmerge his or her "meta"-ebuild and >> depclean. >> If you add everything needed to the respective "meta"-ebuild, you'll >> always be on the safe side. >> >> > > Getting EnigMail set up on a Seamonkey/Win7 box, and Enigmail is > complaining that your signature is unverified. I don't know/understand > PGP/GPG all that well, but I think this is something you're supposed to > be able to fix on your end. If that's not the case, let me know, and > I'll get it fixed on my end. :) > > gpg command line and output: > C:\Program Files (x86)\GNU\GnuPG\gpg.exe > gpg: Signature made 01/03/12 09:05:56 using RSA key ID 8D16461C > gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
Doh...that was supposed to go directly to Hinnerk. "Reply to sender only" my hind leg...
