On Sunday 04 Dec 2011 20:49:55 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 15:18:40 +0000, Mick wrote: > > But then if there were say 5 ebuilds running in parallel and all their > > output printed in the same terminal, it would be almightily difficult > > to untangle the spaghetti that may show up in an error? > > Which is why setting -j >1 sets wh
Did you mean to finish this message later on, or does "wh" mean something? o_O -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
