On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 15:18:40 +0000, Mick wrote: > But then if there were say 5 ebuilds running in parallel and all their > output printed in the same terminal, it would be almightily difficult > to untangle the spaghetti that may show up in an error?
Which is why setting -j >1 sets wh -- Neil Bothwick I don't have any solution, but I certainly admire the problem. at is now the quiet-build option, so you only get the progress information from portage, not from gcc. If one of your ebuilds fails, the gcc output is displayed at the end. -- Neil Bothwick I've got a mind like a... a... what's that thing called?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
