On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:01:34 +0100 "J. Roeleveld" <jo...@antarean.org> wrote:
> On Tue, November 22, 2011 11:47 pm, William Kenworthy wrote: > > <snipped> > > > YMMV ... VB is stable and rarely if ever breaks, app and modules > > "just work" - performance is as good as vmware > > I actually found VB to have better performance. > > When using virtual machines, I tend to run multiple simultaneously. > VirtualBox can handle more on similar hardware the VMWare. > The settings for the VMs (harddisk size, memory size) are identical. > For video-settings, as they generally tend to run server > applications, I really don't care for those and the basic is > generally sufficient. I notice this entire thread has carefully steered around ESXi Now there's an interesting product, with a truly fascinating licensing and pricing model. -- Alan McKinnnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
