Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2011-09-06, Dale<rdalek1...@gmail.com> wrote:
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2011-09-06, Neil Bothwick<n...@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:25:22 +0100, Stroller wrote:
Isn't CUPS really bug and bloaty and horrible?
It's definitely huge. It does however seem to work pretty well.
Huge?
root@fireball / # equery s cups
* net-print/cups-1.5.0-r2
Total files : 482
Total size : 6.41 MiB
root@fireball / #
If that is considered huge, we have a new standard. lol
I stand corrected. For some reason I was under the impression it was
a lot bigger than that.
I thought so. If it was huge, I was hoping you would post yours. Maybe
you have more "stuff" turned on that I do or something.
I do like the next reply in this thread tho. lol
Dale
:-) :-)
