Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2011-07-28, Mick<michaelkintz...@gmail.com>  wrote:

All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to
emerge
Is it any worse that OOo was?

Both took hours, but beyond that, I didn't pay much attention.


My build took about 3.3Gbs of drive space. I ran du just about 5 minutes before it finished so that is pretty close. I would say that 4Gbs should be enough at least on a setup like mine. You don't want to push your luck to far. lol

and on at least two machines I'll have to move to binary.
A few days ago, it took me three tries on one of my machines to get
libreoffice to build.  I think it ran out of disk space the first time,
though the error messages were rather misleading.

The second time I deleted some stuff from the distfiles dir about half
way through the build, and it turns out they were still needed later
in the build).

The third time, it worked. :)


On my machine, it took this:

root@fireball / # genlop -t libreoffice
 * app-office/libreoffice

     Thu Jul 28 12:33:11 2011 >>> app-office/libreoffice-3.3.1
       merge time: 1 hour, 9 minutes and 33 seconds.

root@fireball / #

I did stop it with a ctrl Z for about 5 minutes. I was deleting stuff to give it some more room. This is OOo:

     Tue Jul  5 05:15:01 2011 >>> app-office/openoffice-3.2.1-r1
       merge time: 50 minutes and 27 seconds.


That's about a average. Some were binary installs. I can't recall why I did that now but it was since it only took a minute or so.

That's the report from this rig. AMD 4 cores running at 3.2Ghz with 16Gbs of ram. No tmpfs this time. That wouldn't be fair since I had to stop it for a few minutes.

Dale

:-)  :-)

Reply via email to