On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 13:54 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On 8/10/05, Craig Zeigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If the developers bothered to write stuff like that for every package
> > (most of them have changelogs BTW) Gentoo would be like Debian.. years
> > between releases
> > --
>
> Yeah, true. Besides, when Neil made that comment he was speaking of
> the iso which is the 'installation disc' so I think that Neil was
> completely consistant.
Running diff -upr --ignore-matching-lines='^# \
$Header:' /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.{0,1} it looks
like the differences between 2005.0 and 2005.1 are:
1. The default virtuals for os-headers and linux-sources have been
removed (possibly preparatory to merging headers and sources?)
2. The minimum baselayout version is 1.11.12-r4, up from 1.9.4-r3
3. The minimum binutils version is 2.15.90.0.3-r4, up from
2.14.90.0.8-r1
Of course, other architectures may have more significant changes...
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
