Thank you all about the explanation, what I get from the discussion is
that the release is updated automatcly
thank you, Allan
On 8/11/05, Edward Catmur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 13:54 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > On 8/10/05, Craig Zeigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If the developers bothered to write stuff like that for every package
> > > (most of them have changelogs BTW) Gentoo would be like Debian.. years
> > > between releases
> > > --
> >
> > Yeah, true. Besides, when Neil made that comment he was speaking of
> > the iso which is the 'installation disc' so I think that Neil was
> > completely consistant.
>
> Running diff -upr --ignore-matching-lines='^# \
> $Header:' /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.{0,1} it looks
> like the differences between 2005.0 and 2005.1 are:
>
> 1. The default virtuals for os-headers and linux-sources have been
> removed (possibly preparatory to merging headers and sources?)
> 2. The minimum baselayout version is 1.11.12-r4, up from 1.9.4-r3
> 3. The minimum binutils version is 2.15.90.0.3-r4, up from
> 2.14.90.0.8-r1
>
> Of course, other architectures may have more significant changes...
>
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
