Apparently, though unproven, at 11:27 on Tuesday 14 December 2010, Dale did opine thusly:
> Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Apparently, though unproven, at 10:57 on Tuesday 14 December 2010, Neil > > > > Bothwick did opine thusly: > >> On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 18:15:21 -0600, Dale wrote: > >>>> You're assuming the problem was with HAL rather the the drivers of the > >>>> hardware it was trying to work with... > >>> > >>> So the PS/2 drivers have been working for years and all of a sudden hal > >>> comes along and breaks them? Then on top of that, removing hal AND > >>> using the same kernel results in the PS/2 ports working again. Logic > >>> tells me it was hal, not the kernel. > >> > >> Me too, but you can't know for definite, so you can't really say that > >> your system has been problem free using everything built in, after all, > >> very few people experienced your HAL issues. You seem to have had almost > >> as much trouble with it as Dave Bowman. > > > > "I'm sorry, Dale. I'm afraid I can't do that. This rig is too important > > for me to allow you to jeopardize it." > > I think the name was important. It reminds me of that movie too. I > don't like either one of them. lol > > I hope you have some ideas on my monitor problem. See other thread. I > got issues again. lol I got no bright ideas on that one :-( Monitors and X and HAL and udev and mesa and nvidia and ATI are things that always JustWorked(tm) for me everywhere... -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
