Apparently, though unproven, at 03:14 on Sunday 28 November 2010, Valmor de Almeida did opine thusly:
[snip] > One thing that may be the problem: > > [r...@lpt1 /usr/lib32] > -> ll libGLU.so* > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Nov 27 05:07 libGLU.so -> libGLU.so.1* > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Nov 27 05:07 libGLU.so.1 -> > libGLU.so.1.3.070802* > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 447992 Sep 13 18:28 libGLU.so.1.3.070802* > > Then > > -> equery belongs libGLU.so.1.3.070802 > [ Searching for file(s) libGLU.so.1.3.070802 in *... ] > media-libs/mesa-7.8.2 (/usr/lib64/libGLU.so.1.3.070802) > app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-opengl-20100915 > (/usr/lib32/libGLU.so.1.3.070802) > > Two packages own the same file? Is this correct? They are not the same file. One is in lib32 the other is in lib64 -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
