On Thursday 18 November 2010 12:52:40 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 12:43:40 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > > Indeed. After all, if they were really pedantic, they would point out > > > that you should have written either 24/7/52/75 or 24/365/75 :P > > > > <pedantic mode> > > Or that you both seem to forget the actual reason for the use of > > leap-years.. :P > > </pedantic mode> > > I thought the real reason for leap years was to boot the turnover of the > wedding industry.
Oh? How does that work? > > > Anyway, I do hope to live past my 75th birthday ;) > > Someone that pedantic is unlikely to get more than halfway there :) :) Am glad I'm not that pedantic then :) -- Joost
