On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 12:43:40 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > Indeed. After all, if they were really pedantic, they would point out > > that you should have written either 24/7/52/75 or 24/365/75 :P > > <pedantic mode> > Or that you both seem to forget the actual reason for the use of > leap-years.. :P > </pedantic mode>
I thought the real reason for leap years was to boot the turnover of the wedding industry. > Anyway, I do hope to live past my 75th birthday ;) Someone that pedantic is unlikely to get more than halfway there :) -- Neil Bothwick If you can smile when things go wrong then you have someone in mind to blame.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
