On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Tanstaafl <tansta...@libertytrek.org> wrote: > On 2010-04-12 11:05 AM, Paul Hartman wrote: >> I use the --keep-going always, it was a great addition and especially >> helpful when there is a bad package that won't compile for a week or >> two, it makes it easier to just ignore it. > > Hopefully no one will mind a slight OT question, but still related... > > Is the testing version of portage 2.2 stable enough for production > machines? There are a number of new features I'd like to take advantage > of, but have always hesitated to and any non-stable system packages.
I've been using portage unmasked for a very long time and don't remember having any portage-related problems. I'm sure there must be some (or else why is it still RC?) but for me the new features are worth the potential risk of using less-tested code.
