> On 11 Nov 2022, at 22:06, Gordon Pettey <petteyg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 6:27 PM John Helmert III <a...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 09:49:27PM +0100, Jonas Stein wrote: > > On 10/11/2022 03:27, John Helmert III wrote: > > > The first GLSA in glsa.git is GLSA-200310-03, the third GLSA of > > > October 2003. It used roughly the same format of the GLSAs we release > > > today, in 2022, making that format almost as old as me. > > > > IFF we change the format, we should not invent a new standard [1] but > > use existing one like CSAF [2] > > > > [1] https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/standards.png > > [2] https://oasis-open.github.io/csaf-documentation/ > > We're not inventing a new "standard", we're upgrading the format we use > to distribute GLSAs. > > Standard, format, semantics. You are producing a new schema in a field where > at least one usable (and already-improved?) schema exists. NIH?
Can you point to a format which would support using our ebuild operators & syntax rather than making a (very) vague suggestion? See also ajak's point about being the one to implement it, in lieu of volunteers.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
