> > > > I wouldn't block anyone from doing this, but it's not something I'm > > personally interested in pursuing. I see very little value here. > > First, you're trying to justify replacing repoman on an entirely subjective > opinion of "I think <foo> is superior" ...
Well, if you've ever tried it you'll notice that <foo> for <foo> != repoman actually finishes the checks within a finite amount of time. Kind of, the most blatant argument for ditching repoman, actually. -- Andreas K. Hüttel dilfri...@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux developer (council, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
